Your move

[Millsy 82]

Anybody ever worked for this company, I've just read through there terms and conditions, what a joke they have 1 that pretty much says if they don't pay you you can't stop working for them!! Haha

I don't think I will bother with them then.

 

[REDSAW]

as in the estate agent?

 

[Millsy 82]

Yeah the estate agent I'm not surprised there looking for someone looking through their terms.

 

[rpm]

Anybody ever worked for this company, I've just read through there terms and conditions, what a joke they have 1 that pretty much says if they don't pay you you can't stop working for them!! Haha

I don't think I will bother with them then.

Sounds like Donald Trump wrote that for them. lol

 

[REDSAW]

obviously dont like paying and dont like walkers when not been paid.lol

 

[Millsy 82]

obviously dont like paying and dont like walkers when not been paid.lol

That's what I got off it. There was another that said payment terms are 14 days then about 2 lines later said it could take up to 60 days and they can query any they like and that the time it is being queried doesn't count.

 

[joni os]

This highlights a practice so common it must be taught to aspiring entrepreneurs at business school alongside planned," prepack" liquidations.
Basically you get sucked into a commitment where payments gradually fall behind until the sixth job is completed before the third has been paid for. Allow this to continue and the hit you take on the eventual fallout just gets bigger.

 

[oz-plumber]

That contract wouldn't stand up in court.

I would sent a copy of their contract to the Law Institute or Ombudsmen ( or similar )
and ask them to have a look at it.

The said contract wouldn't be around much after it was looked at and I dare say the company that provided the contract would have a good talking to or fine.

You can't have a contract that operates outside of the Law, nor have a contract that is one sided .

 

[hammers4spanner]

Ask for a signed document with your terms from them .
Say tenant pays they then pay tenant lol

 

[joni os]

That contract wouldn't stand up in court.

I would sent a copy of their contract to the Law Institute or Ombudsmen ( or similar )
and ask them to have a look at it.

The said contract wouldn't be around much after it was looked at and I dare say the company that provided the contract would have a good talking to or fine.

You can't have a contract that operates outside of the Law, nor have a contract that is one sided .

The general public,as consumers, get some protection against unfair conditions of contract. The same protection does not extend to contracts between commercial enterprises, where each party is judged to be contracting on an equal basis with full knowledge and awareness.

 

[joni os]

That contract wouldn't stand up in court.

I would sent a copy of their contract to the Law Institute or Ombudsmen ( or similar )
and ask them to have a look at it.

The said contract wouldn't be around much after it was looked at and I dare say the company that provided the contract would have a good talking to or fine.

You can't have a contract that operates outside of the Law, nor have a contract that is one sided .

The general public,as consumers, get some protection against unfair conditions of contract. The same protection does not extend to contracts between commercial enterprises, where each party is judged to be contracting on an equal basis with full knowledge and awareness.