We still haven't replaced our WB Heatslave 3.5, partly because of ongoing other works, but also still undecided about the best product/manufacturer. BG serviced it this week and the service engineer said that WB are good but Vaillant put a bit more thought into the design. I asked about Viessman and he said they are ok but the boards fail, then it gets pricey and spares can take a while.
I was speaking to someone today with an engineering background, they have a smallish 30yr old Ideal (I think), their engineer said he only needs to see it every 2yrs as there is so little to go wrong. She has done a fair bit of research and is putting off getting a new combi as so many people have told her that the printed circuit boards fail after 5 yrs.
Also the modern heat exchangers are alu and not as long lived as cast iron.
Is this generally the case then as if so it seems like a good repair protection scheme would be essential and that partly defeats the object of upgrading to a more efficient boiler?
I was speaking to someone today with an engineering background, they have a smallish 30yr old Ideal (I think), their engineer said he only needs to see it every 2yrs as there is so little to go wrong. She has done a fair bit of research and is putting off getting a new combi as so many people have told her that the printed circuit boards fail after 5 yrs.
Also the modern heat exchangers are alu and not as long lived as cast iron.
Is this generally the case then as if so it seems like a good repair protection scheme would be essential and that partly defeats the object of upgrading to a more efficient boiler?