- Messages
- 586
All trades should have a register and licence approach. Cut down on cowboys and I believe people would have a better understanding of an apples for apples price for works as everyone, I think, would be in more or less the same ball park using the correct trades for the scope. Everyone would know that bob was not a tiler, spark and plumber unless they could produce their trading licence to prove they were competent. Maybe even make it mandatory to have all relevant trade ID numbers on paperwork and van.
I’ve worked in highly unionised environments and they are a nightmare.
I’ve even once nearly caused a strike in one. I reported the light in the room I was working in had failed. Then spent 2 days working by torch light, finally I lost my rag and went and stole a lamp from another room. A day and a half later an electrician turned up and was seriously angry I had the audacity to do what was an electricians job.
Even the simplest of jobs become a chew, you’d need about 6 different “licensed” trades people to fit a bathroom. It’s hard enough getting a plaster to turn up in the same month you want one.
[automerge]1569228458[/automerge]
I`m gonna disagree about everyone would be more or less in the same ballpark price wise, don`t think it will happen as there will always be somebody willing to do it cheaper, ie newbies starting out and wanting the work.
Many industries and most big companies have quite well set out pay scales based on experience/competence/responsibility. It can in theory be done, it only comes unstuck with little one man bands.
With the notable exception of gas the vast majority of construction quality regulation seems to hold householder and not the contractor responsible. You’d probably have a lot fewer cowboys chucking up extensions with little or no regard for building regulations if they were liable and not the home owner.
Last edited: