Unvented cylinder discharge pipe

[peter7463h7]

We recently had a 120 litre Gold unvented cylinder fitted in our first floor airing cupboard. The cylinder's pressure release valve D2 discharge pipe is plastic (originally fitted for the previous twenty year old BoilerMate) and looks about 22mm diameter. There is approx 100mm of vertical section discharge pipe between the tundish and the first 90 degree bend. There are two such bends before a straight run of pipe (with a nice looking fall) about two metres long that goes behind the bath and through the external wall and exits over a concrete path in our garden at a height of about 2500mm. British Gas inspected this last week and refused to insure the central heating under their Homecare plan (a) because of the plastic pipe, and (b) because the pipe exits over a walkway. Their inspector also wasn't happy about the 100mm vertical section between tundish and first bend. The plumber who fitted the cylinder has suggested replacing the D2 with copper (not sure what size he intends using, I'm assuming 22mm is a minimum) and turning the pipe towards the wall where it exits. Not sure what his plan is regarding the 100mm vertical section (I now realise this should be 300mm minimum, though I can't see how he can achieve this as there's precious little vertical room to manoeuvre in the airing cupboard).


I can't see any reference to turning the pipe towards the wall in the G3 building regulations. Is this an acceptable way to terminate the discharge pipe?


Also, just how critical is the 300mm minimum vertical drop between tundish and first bend?


Thanks

 

[iiplumbing]

Russ, does that tundish rely on the weight of the water to compress the spring, and push down the rubber to allow water to get flow into d2?

If so, do you think it will still operate in years to come when the spring potentially scales up?

hi tolly

yes your right about the water being used to operate the valve

it has been carefully designed to open at between 4ml-10ml of water acting on the diaphragm to allow low volume flow

it will also take a full discharge volume flow from the TRV/PRV (ie under annual cylinder maintenance valve operation

and it is a requirement of the warranty of the product (2 years parts and labour + 3 further years full product replacement, that Hotun is serviced annually

on the plus side the company is being proactive in its warranty cards in that it will be offering to the installer of the product (and hence cylinder at the same time) that it will write to both installer and end user that the products require annual service and that the installation company should be giving them a call also. So you can pick up cylinder maintenance work!

If Hotun is operated annually the mechanism will work and function as required.

cheers

russ

 

[Ermintrude]

It's a nice bit of kit russ.

 

[Ermintrude]

Better than this:-

Kitchen snitters

 

[iiplumbing]

Thanks Ermin

OMG the connection you show is so non compliant for starters

1/ Undue consumption (no visible means of seeing discharge)
2/ Safety issues, if you cant see that the PRV is discharging telling you that there is something wrong with the cylinder then you don't know its malfunctioning
3/ No Back flow contamination from Cat 5 water!!

Householder can be held criminally responsible if the regulator finds out and he doesn't comply with enforcement notices.............

Russ

 

[chris watkins]

approved by who Chris?

as the regulations stand the product does not have to be approved by anyone! Having said that it does have to comply with 7 regulatory provisions or be no less effective than the guidance given.

This product complies with all relevant regulations and it temperature rated to 100degC

if someone wants to find out more details then please pm me and I will provide ALL compliance documentation
back to Chris, who would you want it "approved" by and I'll let you know what the status is at this time
cheers
russ

Got a vested interest in this one then Russ ?? It would be nice for you to declare it, if this is the case.
All I know is that a couple of years back was talking to Multikwik or McAlpine, can't remember which, they had a spring operated waste valve & I asked their technical was this suitable for use inplace of the HepvO, as it was temp rated & was told no it was not approved & could not be used as it had not been tested.
How do you prove it is fit for purpose ?

 

[Ermintrude]

Thanks Ermin

OMG the connection you show is so non compliant for starters

1/ Undue consumption (no visible means of seeing discharge)
2/ Safety issues, if you cant see that the PRV is discharging telling you that there is something wrong with the cylinder then you don't know its malfunctioning
3/ No Back flow contamination from Cat 5 water!!

Householder can be held criminally responsible if the regulator finds out and he doesn't comply with enforcement notices.............

Russ

Fully complaint with mi. Pulled kitchen mugs. Was there assessing the mess they made 6kw load on 10mm piggy back! Woop woop

 

[iiplumbing]

Got a vested interest in this one then Russ ?? It would be nice for you to declare it, if this is the case.
All I know is that a couple of years back was talking to Multikwik or McAlpine, can't remember which, they had a spring operated waste valve & I asked their technical was this suitable for use inplace of the HepvO, as it was temp rated & was told no it was not approved & could not be used as it had not been tested.
How do you prove it is fit for purpose ?

By vested interest do you mean that I have something to do with the development of the product? In that case yes I do.

The problem the industry faces is to discharge the PRV waste in full compliance with the regs

Historically the PRV was first piped to tundish then pipe to drain safely outside the building, problem with that was it was very expensive. Then someone very clever at Wavin or Hepworth thought of using their Hepvo as an odour trap located after the tundish, it was cheaper and a better solution that overcame most situations. Over the last few years it is fast becoming the staple of EVERY unvented (large) cylinder install and I can see why, so hats off to them.

Now you have spotted something that I did as well and came across the same answer from McAlpine, I asked why not put a tundish then a tun valve after the tundish, as you point out it is temperature rated. I suppose being a big company they tend to be shy of making the wrong recommendations so gave you the answer they did. That said I have seen a few installations put in that way and I am sure they would past muster in terms of regulation compliance and fit for purpose especially as Ermintrude has pointed out above, the alternative non compliant installations.

This new product, Hotun, is innovative because it includes the spring return and within the height of a standard tundish! I tell you it was no easy feat to engineer that one and make it work.

The key really was to ensure it sealed tight against odours but still let trickle volumes through, step in one clever spring manufacturer, get the rate right, know your lengths and tolerances to allow for spring pre-tension, know the all up weight of the sprung components, know intimately how the water regs and bulding regs overlap and how to ensure compliance, solve all that and Hotun is born.

I stand true to the ethos of providing professional help to people and have no problems about telling them what is available as alternatives because ultimately you will find that the other alternative solutions are always more expensive to buy and then install than Hotun. And let us not forget that when dealing with under counter installations space is always at a premium........

But that is for the installation professionals to find out by research.

Over to you guys and I hope I am still on the right side of forum rules if not I will take these posts down without hesitation because I have a difficult balancing act to get right, and on that that's over to you Chris, would you please be as kind to pm me and let me know as I do not want to fall foul of the rules.

Cheers

Russ

 

[Worcester]

There's the Building Regs and then there's Approved documents.

We just had a recent interesting run in with our compliance body, when we proved one system highly compliant with the Building Regs and totally contrary to the Approved Documents, it took them three weeks to finally agree we were right and the system we installed was safe and compliant. (Building Control had been happy all along )

It was not the Approved Document G, Section G3, it was another regulation, though the principal applies - all you have to do is show that:

From UKSI 2010 No. 2214, The Budilding Regulations 2010

Schedule 1, Part G Paragraph G3 Hot Water Systems:

A hot water system that has a hot water storage vessel must incorporate precautions to -
a) prevent the temperature of the stored water in the vessel at any time exceeding 100°C
b) ensure that any discharge from safety devices is safely conveyed to where it is visible but will not cause a danger to persons in or about the building.

So that's it, just prove the above (no mention of tundishes, no mention of 600mm or 300mm or one size larger....) - easy way roll over and blindly follow the AD, or work with the likes of Russ to find practical solutions. From Russ's point of view an independent test body (any will do) showing temperature and flow parameters could then be used to support your compliance assertions.

 

[peter7463h7]

Thanks to everyone for taking the trouble to reply. The installer came back and fitted a 22mm copper discharge pipe down the side of our house and terminating a few inches above ground level. He also reconfigured the pipework in the airing cupboard to give a 300mm vertical section between tundish and first bend/elbow. British Gas inspected today and said it was fine. We're now back on British Gas HomeCare 400.

 

[chris watkins]

Thanks to everyone for taking the trouble to reply. The installer came back and fitted a 22mm copper discharge pipe down the side of our house and terminating a few inches above ground level. He also reconfigured the pipework in the airing cupboard to give a 300mm vertical section between tundish and first bend/elbow. British Gas inspected today and said it was fine. We're now back on British Gas HomeCare 400.

Thats great & you seem to be happy to be back with BG but was the installation notified to your local Building Control ?

 

[GasmanxxxR1]

Thanks to everyone for taking the trouble to reply. The installer came back and fitted a 22mm copper discharge pipe down the side of our house and terminating a few inches above ground level. He also reconfigured the pipework in the airing cupboard to give a 300mm vertical section between tundish and first bend/elbow. British Gas inspected today and said it was fine. We're now back on British Gas HomeCare 400.

I hope the discharge run is no more than 9 meters including bends

 

[peter7463h7]

We received a "Buildings Regulation Compliance Gas Safety Certificate" shortly after the installation. The discharge pipe is no more than 5 metres long with three bends.