Discuss Mains Stopcock has been replace by my builder, is that right? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Holly2011

Hi,
I wonder if someone could give me some advice please? I have been having some work done in my house. My builder told me because of a slow leak in the main water pipe to my property he had to replace the old lead pipe,which he did. The stopcock to the water mains was under the front door in a hatch under the mat.

However, on doing my mid inspection I found that the builder had relocated the water mains stopcock into the electrical and gas cupboard under the stairs, which I am fine with if it is ok to re-locate it here? if anyone can tell me if this conforms to building regs i would be grateful.

My 2nd main concern was that he showed me that he had replaced the stopcock with some kind or lever which I was concerned with as I have never seen such a thing. I was concerned that If somone moved a chair in the cupboard they could accidently switch off the water. This lever thing also to me looked a bit weak, althoguh it did look easy to turn off or on. My main worry was that as the water coming into the house will be under mains pressure especially with the leak in the old piping eradicated I was anxious to know if this lever thing can burst, seize up or ever stop me from turning off the water if I am in a situation where I need to turn it off.

Is it best to stick with this new lever thing or go back to my old stopcock. If I need to get a new stopcock can anyone reccomend a reliable brand??

You answers are fully appreciated,

Thanks Holly:rolleyes:
 
The reason you see lots of leaking stop cocks is many will be fifty plus years old ive had levers fail usualy around the spindle which means the valve has had it ,where as a stopcock of fifty years old can often be repacked and go on for another fifty
 
The reason you see lots of leaking stop cocks is many will be fifty plus years old ive had levers fail usualy around the spindle which means the valve has had it ,where as a stopcock of fifty years old can often be repacked and go on for another fifty

That is well true. Any plumber should be able to repair a stopcock in 10 minutes (including *** break);)
 
WRAS guide lines state the following for the premesis supply pipe ...'where should the stop valve be fitted' a) inside the premises b) above floor level c) as near as possible to the point entry d) to control the supply to the whole premesis and should NOT shut off the supply to any other premesis. As for a stopcock .. it states a stopvalve is required so a lever valve is ok and much better (in my humble opinion) ... (providing its the correct BS standard) .. not sure why it's position in the house had to change? .. as for backflow .. all connections to the cold water supply such as outside taps and appliances should have adequate B/F preventions built. Oh and a drain valve should be fitted inside directly above the stop valve .. hope this helps :)
 
Due to him replacing the lead he probably thought it would be more accessible for you and less risk of freezing. It's not a bad thing he's done. Maybe incurred more work for himself. Sounds like a good guy :Angel_anim:
 
Lever valves are good and easy to use, Yes.

However a stopcock that conforms to BS1010 should always be fitted to the incoming mains as the main main stopcock after that.

If you want an easier way of turning off your water than getting down to and turning the stopcock, have a surestop fitted.
 
Ok intrigued. Why does a stopcock need to be fitted after the lever valve? They restrict the flow into the house by around 50% straight off and showers and all contamination points have to have check valves in accordance with the water regulations. I was actually told by the guy teaching the water regulations course that there is no longer any requirement for a normal stopcock. Can you point me to something that says differently?

Backflow protection should be fitted just before the appliance where flow limitations of restrictive valves don't affect the whole house, surely this is just good design?
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised at that advice (not fitting a stopcock). Sounds a little like not bothering with a switch on the consumer unit to turn off all the electricity.

What happens if a pipe's knocked or screwed into, just inside the house and the stopcock is 100 yards away down the drive and hidden under a holly bush? There'll be gallons chucked out before the water's stopped!! Having a stopcock inside is always a priority for me and if a house hasn't got one I advise them to have one fitted (by myself, of course!)
 
Ok intrigued. Why does a stopcock need to be fitted after the lever valve? They restrict the flow into the house by around 50% straight off and showers and all contamination points have to have check valves in accordance with the water regulations. I was actually told by the guy teaching the water regulations course that there is no longer any requirement for a normal stopcock. Can you point me to something that says differently?

Backflow protection should be fitted just before the appliance where flow limitations of restrictive valves don't affect the whole house, surely this is just good design?

Sorry mate, didnt mean it to read the way it did, A stopcock should be fitted, with or without, a lever valve, if you want a lever valve aswell as then the lever valve can be fitted after the stopcock.

Having said that, it makes more sense to me to have a full bore lever valve instead as less restrictive etc... but they dont conform to BS1010 afaik so therefore has to be a stopcock.
 
Sorry mate, didnt mean it to read the way it did, A stopcock should be fitted, with or without, a lever valve, if you want a lever valve aswell as then the lever valve can be fitted after the stopcock.

Having said that, it makes more sense to me to have a full bore lever valve instead as less restrictive etc... but they dont conform to BS1010 afaik so therefore has to be a stopcock.
eh!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Some stop cocks although with BS 1010/2 standard eventually will corode even made with DZR material. I've just replaced 2 in a block of flats, had to use pipe freezing machine because mains could not be turned off in any flat separately!
 
I'm digging up an old thread, I know, but this one comes up highly on google searches, and since I've had a recent discussion on this, I thought I should post here...

There is some really comprehensive info on the use of ball valves as the stopvalve for a premesis, and various other water-regs related info (check valves, strainers) in a document by Arrow Valves which I found (google for waterrregstutorial9-isolatingvalves.doc ).

... it's well worth a read, but a quick summary:

There is no longer any requirement to use the BS 1010 style stop-cock. The new regs only refer to "stopvalves", and this can be any suitable valve, including ball valves which conform to an appropriate British Standard (e.g. BSIKitemarked), or appropriate European standard, or the Regulator’sspecification (e.g. WRAS / KIWA UK).

Some ball valves incorporate a serviceable spindle gland nut, and PTFE packing, just like the traditional BS 1010 stop cocks do. IMO, these are the type to use as stopvalves. Some have serviceable o-rings instead. Many don't have any sort of serviceable spindle seal, and so are the aforementioned chuck-away-and-replace type...

I've nothing to do with arrow valves and have never (AFAIK) bought any of their stuff, BTW. They have some quite nifty looking ball valves with built-in easily-serviceable strainers, and check valves tho', which I might try and get hold of to give them a spin.

Ball valves shouldn't be used where there is a risk of freezing, as they're more prone to damage than stop-cocks are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Personally I know that full bore lever valves have no back-flow protection, but as has already been said, water meters have backflow protection. As should showers and garden taps. I'm not convinced that stopcocks offer fantastic back-flow protection either. What I do know is I've been to countless jobs where I've had to repair leaking stopcocks. Never been to a job where I've had to repair a leaking lever valve yet.

If I'm ever replacing a stopcock then I always replace them with a lever valve. The only real downside I can see with these is you have to turn them off slowly, especially on a high pressure mains. Otherwise you can get fairly severe water hammer if the water is flowing when you turn it off.

Most lever ball valves are rated up to 10 bars, some are rated to 25 bars. As lead-free solder joints start to give up the ghost at about 10 bars I wouldn't worry too much about the ball valve failing on you!

if youve never seen a leaking lever valve you havent lived, they are prone to sticking if not operated reglarly such that the first time you close them the nylon bush inside breaks and theres water everywhere. Water regs still require a stopcock to my knowledge and its bad practice not to use the required item even if old ladies like them. standards as ever going to the dogs!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Reply to Mains Stopcock has been replace by my builder, is that right? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Newest Plumbing Threads

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock