As you now probably realise to get full cylinder capacity you would need to use bottom coil. We have 'future proofed ' a number of properties by fitting 300 ltr solar cylinder ready for future extensions / roof alterations.
To give full capacity then linked the 2 coils together or fitted extra 2 port valve controlled by extra cylinder stat to give full capacity when required.
With the top coil only in use you have effectively a 175 litre cylinder, the water immediately beneath this coil will heat up a tiny amount and is not wasted but doesn't add to the 175 litres at 65C.I am still having trouble understanding, mainly, the cylinder part of the system. I am trying to gather information before speaking to people who can supply and install it, as when left to the builder who arranged it 11 years ago, it is not the best solution and I do not want to get it wrong (and would like to have at least some basic understanding so I can understand what they are recomending as experience shows people recommend differently).
I originally had solar panels but had them removed and the solar coil was left unconnected. The system was insured using Homeserve and when when they had to change the cylinder they did so on a like for like basis (even though they were told and knew there was no longer any solar) and the plumbing people they contracted out to (as needed extra qualifications to work on unvented) used only the top coil, same as the one that was originally there.
I have looked at How a Twin Coil Cylinder Works - https://www.viridiansolar.co.uk/resources-3-7-1-twin-coil-cylinder.html and it appears that the whole 300 litres is used. The boiler part will heat up the part of it and above until it gets to temperature (which I think was set to 65 degrees, the boiler temperature is set to 70) but I would have thought (probably wrongly) that the water immediately below it would also be around the 65 degrees mark (and then gradually reduce as it gets lower and lower).
So possibly the 65 degrees will only apply to the top 175L (once heated) with the other 125L below it gradually reducing in temperature?
Is there any problem with having the two coils linked, presumably just longer to heat as now a larger volume to heat? Or would it have been better to just use the lower coil or leave it as it is now?
Listening to the boiler it appears that the shutting down/overrun starts after ~40 minutes and continues on/off for ~10-20 minutes doing so (depends upon how much hot water was drawn off beforehand). Presumably as the cylinder is at 65 and the the boiler at 70? Is there any issue with upping the boiler temperature to say 75 so a better differential (I asked the Homeserve engoineer who serviced it and he said that 70 is better as boiler more efficient and that the cylinder would heat up correctly even if just a degree or two higher than the cyclinder temperature that has been set).
Thanks
Colin
If you want to utilize the full 300 litres then you have 3 options, 1. connect the two coils in series where the hot boiler water goes in the top coil, down through both coils and exits the solar coil outlet, you effectively have one coil of ~ twice the heating power of one but heating ~ 300 litres of water, it certainly won't heat the 300 litres in the same time as one coil heating the top but will not take twice as long either, somewhere in between. 2. connect the two coils in parallel where the the hot water enters both coils separately and exits separately which theoretically should give a faster warm up than the two in series, in practice it won't because the circ pump would have to supply twice the flow to achieve this which it won't. 3. connect the bottom coil only which will heat the 300 litres but will take twice as long as heating the top half.
Choice 3 will only require the same boiler power as your existing top half heating, Choice 1 ~ 8/10 kw extra power & choice 2 ~ 12/15 kw extra.
Re the 70/65C boiler/coil differential, this will cause rapid cycling with a 12 kw turndown boiler as the HW temp approaches 60/65C, 75C boiler temp will help but will result in a slight loss of boiler efficiency.
Last edited: