Search the forum,

Discuss Ideal Mexico Gravity DHW in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

j1cta

Hi All,

My First post and new to plumbing and heating.

I’m looking for some technical advice regarding an Ideal Mexico Slimline RS 3/50.

I have an installation which currently uses a Gravity DHW and Pumped CH with all 4 tapping being used in the boiler. All pipework is 22mm and not 28mm as suggested in the manual.

The Left hand side of the boiler is for CH and the Right hand side for DHW.

For each circuit, the feed is at the top and the return is at the bottom.

The DHW does not rise immediately from the boiler but drops below the floor for about a 1m before rising. Horizontal HDW run to the storage tank is about 6m.

The heating seems to be working fine, but the DHW is non existent. Only warming about 2m of the feed pipework.

The manual doesn't really say too much but I would like to know, if each circuit is independent of the other inside the boiler, as it doesn't seem to be. Also there are 2 header tanks (1 large – Cold water and 1 small - DHW/expansion) but only 1 top-up feed to the DHW circuit and nothing to the CH circuit. The CH circuit does fill, but very very very slowly.

Does this all sound something like or is it a total abomination that needs a re-hash to a fully pumped system???

Any help would be appreciated.
 
sounds a mess get a pro in,you say theres only a feed to the dhw but not ch? sounds like a primatic system but that would have just one large tank
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep. 2 Tanks but only DHW gets its feed from the small 1.
What do you think to the circuits maybe crossing in the boiler?
Has this ever been done on the old cast iron boilers with multiple circuits?
 
there are no circuits inside the boiler just one space the water in both circuits is fed from the small tank there will be another 22mm pipe from the tank to the base of cylinder to feed hw
gravity circuits should rise from the boiler but we must assume this system has worked
it sounds like you have drained the system as you say its slow to fill you may have an airlock in the primaries up to the cylinder try cracking the nut where the flow goes into the cylinder
pics of boiler and cylinder cupboard might help diagnose this better
 
Thanks Steve. Yes that all sounds like you've seen this before.

So your saying the 2 circuits are mixed in a single space inside the boiler.

OK so that explains the two circuits (or 1 big circuit) in the boiler situation.

I tried to bleed the DHW circuit with a little cheat. I added a bleed nipple to the primary feed pipe at the cylinder (which goes higher than the cylinder), just before it enters. It bleeds up fine but still no DHW flow. Just 2m getting hot from the boiler on this circuit.

Just a thought. But should the feed from the small tank be into the feed or return?
It's currently in the return (Side/lower cylinder tapping) as opposed to the feed (Side/Upper cylinder tapping) which marries to all the diagrams that I've seen for this type of system.

I'll do a little drawing of the system, and add it to the forum.

The rads bleed fine downstairs but are nearly impossible to bleed upstairs. Its as if theres not enough pressure in the water in to push the air out.
 
Just drawn the layout.

The DHW pipework is purposefully shown to leave the boiler and travel below ground before rising to the cylinder.

img004.jpg


Again, any help is greatly appreciated.
 
are you saying that the vent for your hot water goes over the f&e not the cold water tank?
 
Steveb, little typo on my part.

I've updated the drawing to vent to the right tank.
 
I don't see how that gravity hot water circuit will work. The flow from the boiler needs to rise all the way to the cylinder,the way it's shown on your drawing means the hottest water can't flow around the low point that's been created. Also gravity pipework should be in 28mm,not 22.

If the flow was altered it would work but a better option would be to reconfigure the hot water circuit so the system becomes fully pumped,fit zone valves and a cylinder and room stat,bypass etc and the boiler wired to prevent short cycling. It would be much more efficient this way.

It's obviously been in for a while so it's odd that it's not been a problem before,with gravity pipework like that I'm surprised it's worked at all.
 
Thats what I thought. The boiler manual seems to predict that it wouldn't work but I wanted to get some expert opinions.

The cylinder does have an immersion fitted and I'm wondering if this is what has been used to heat the water rather than the gravity actually working.

The property is very dilapidated and has been bought from a family inheriting from their parents and thus the new owner is looking to update as cheaply as possible.

I've never come across gravity DHW before and wanted to be sure before I advise on changes to it.
 
gravity domestics are common ,best bet combi,just fit a good one (BAXI) and de scale properly
 
I agree with Bartdude. There is no way the gravity circuit will work. Im from the old school of heating before fully pumped heating and your example has been carried out by someone who don't know what their doing. Your drawing by the way is great.

I am not sure about a cheap answer to the problem. Lets look at what you've got: Boiler although very good is about 25+ years old and probably contains asbestos on the combustion seal gaskets. Additionally well past its useful life expectancy. Gravity systems by todays standards are very inefficient and not now permitted on replacements or new systems.

Recomendation: Replace boiler for up to date 90%+ efficient model. Up date pipework and controls to a fully pumped system. (Room thermostat, and cylinder thermostat interlocked with the boiler, Thermostatic rediator valves for all bar one rads). Should also consider a proper power flush and installation of a magnetic filter to protected the new boiler.
 
That has never in it's life worked as it is.
Change it to this
img004.jpg

and learn yourself a bit more about systems.
 
Guys, Great comments.

My original comments where to bring the system (especially the boiler) more up to date, but the customer is quite difficult to advise and doesn't want to spend any money.

Will it work on 22mm, cos the whole thing is 22mm, but it's supposed to be 28mm MIN (as per manual). If I make TAMZ changes and it still doesn't work then I'm goosed that'll be at my cost, not the customer.

Will try again with my original thoughts to upgrade.

Cheers guys.
 
I would expect it to work in 22mm if the pipe run is not too long. As said before it should be in 28mm but a lot of systems out there aren't.

If the customer is not interested in spending money then altering the pipework is the cheapest option in the short term. Just make it clear that it's not the best way to proceed and the present system is out of date and inefficient at best.
 
you can leave the return where it is its just the flow pipe you need to alter to run continously upwards from the boiler tapping ,droped returns were quite common and there was a school of thought that says they make them work better
yes id expect this to work in 22
 
I would walk away. custard will throw it back in your face if all goes wrong. Sit by recommendations for an up to date system. Not worth the hassel.
 
There is something not right about this.
The system as it was drawn would never work. The boiler is 10-15 yrs old so something has changed. It will work fine with a bit alteration but if the op is indeed a plumber/eng called out to a job i would be wary.
 
I would not mess around update system, reg man spot on with advice, your the expert inform customer of your recommendations and explain the ins and outs, if they dont listen walk away as you could end up in bother, you could try messing with existing system but circs wrong size 22mm not 28mm, you mess and it is still not right you wont get paid. Upgrade and it also more efficent cheaper running costs etc, your the expert explain to customer carefully and 99 out of 100 will take your advice, hope this helps have been self employed for 29 years as plumber/heating/gas engineer so i think i have a little experience regarding customers etc.
 
Well Guys, finally finished the updating this system. Have been off an on for the last few weeks.

Converted it to a fully pumped/open vented system. Having inserted a couple of manual bleeds to get the airlocks out, and the rath of a dodgy (new) Tank stat, it seems to work OK.

The boiler seems a little louder than I would have expected and takes longer to warm things up (15Kw Max), but it does seem do what it's supposed to do (eventually).

Thanks for all your help. I think I've managed to thank everyone involved.

Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Reply to Ideal Mexico Gravity DHW in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Similar plumbing topics

We are from Alberta, and I own an electrical company. I have been asked by a BC Mechanical P. Eng. to install an emergency STOP button at the man-door to the boiler room. It's intent is to 'halt' the operation of the boilers in the room should there be an emergency. He is demanding that I do...
Replies
5
Views
242
Hi, Can anyone advise as to why the cold water to my bathroom keeps airlocking? This originally happened about 12 months ago and has happened 3-4 times since. It’s an upstairs bathroom, fed from a tank in the attic. The tank is about 8 Meters away and feeds a bath, sink and toilet. The tank...
Replies
9
Views
316
Hello all, I'm would like to extend an existing outside tap to another point in the garden. I'm about to pour a concrete patio and was hoping to run the water line underneath. There are existing drain (and who knows what) pipes running along the same wall so I'm nervous about digging too far...
Replies
6
Views
224
We run a community village hall and have a large kitchen provided for the use of hirers. This includes a Lincat SLR9 gas cooker which I believe is a 23.8Kw appliance with all six burners and oven on max. This was installed some 10 years ago and has passed all subsequent Gas Safety inspections as...
Replies
5
Views
424
Hello all, I’m replacing a concrete paving slab patio in the back yard. The original patio used 50mm deep concrete slabs on hardcore & sand. I’m planning to pour a 100mm deep concrete patio on 100mm hardcore. In order to achieve the same final height to line up with the rest of the patio, I...
Replies
6
Views
226
Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

Newest Plumbing Threads

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock