Search the forum,

Discuss Why are Cylinders rarely in the loft for Trad. Gravity Vented Systems? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Messages
38
Sorry if I come at this form the wrong direction. I'd like to move my vented-cylinder into the loft. I run two shower-pumps too. I realise a sealed-cylinder is the easy route. Sadly I've not got much mains pressure. Combination boilers don't really have the grunt for fire-hose showers.

I'm hoping it's as simple as buying a vented combination HW cylinder as tall as I can find space for. Then site it as high as possible.

Both with a good wall to sit on, I'd like to site the cylinder in one of two places. Loft height is the issue:

Site A: 8ft of space but right in the midst of the loft, space I want for a loft-conversion.
Site B: 4'6" in a gable-end (out of the way)

Out of the way is B favourite, but minded to trad. systems usually having HW cylinder and CW tank on different levels I question the headroom, at 4'6" in the gable-end.

Minded to shower-pumps, two questions.

1) I realise the CW + F&E traditinally goes far above the waterline of the HW tank, but not why? Do CW + F&E tanks really need to go far above the HW tank? Even back in the day, if the height and insulation is there, why did yesterday's plumbers not put the lot up in the loft?
2) Can I move my vented HW tank to Site B: 4'6" in a gable-end (out of the way).

.
,
 
Last edited:
Because you will have virtually no head as most loft are low so the cylinder was sited in a cupboard normally in a bedroom with the tank in the loft sometimes lifted up on a still to give a decent head of water.
 
Last edited:
why did yesterday's plumbers not put the lot up in the loft?

2 further reasons,
The further the Hot cylinder is from the point of use the greater the dead leg of water is.
That means more wasted water and more energy wasted heating up the new dead leg of water.
Depending on which yesterday you want to use, houses generally didn't have central heating, tumble driers didn't exist, rooms were cold and damp so the airing cupboard was an essential.
You couldn't have an airing cupboard in the loft..
 
Sorry if I come at this form the wrong direction. I'd like to move my vented-cylinder into the loft. I run two shower-pumps too. I realise a sealed-cylinder is the easy route. Sadly I've not got much mains pressure. Combination boilers don't really have the grunt for fire-hose showers.

I'm hoping it's as simple as buying a vented combination HW cylinder as tall as I can find space for. Then site it as high as possible.

Both with a good wall to sit on, I'd like to site the cylinder in one of two places. Loft height is the issue:

Site A: 8ft of space but right in the midst of the loft, space I want for a loft-conversion.
Site B: 4'6" in a gable-end (out of the way)

Out of the way is B favourite, but minded to trad. systems usually having HW cylinder and CW tank on different levels I question the headroom, at 4'6" in the gable-end.

Minded to shower-pumps, two questions.

1) I realise the CW + F&E traditinally goes far above the waterline of the HW tank, but not why? Do CW + F&E tanks really need to go far above the HW tank? Even back in the day, if the height and insulation is there, why did yesterday's plumbers not put the lot up in the loft?
2) Can I move my vented HW tank to Site B: 4'6" in a gable-end (out of the way).

.
,

The head at the tap is created by how far the cold water tank is above it, the hot water cylinder is, effectively a bulge in the pipe where water is heated. My HW cylinder is in the loft, with the bottom of the cold water tank just above (about 12") the top of the HW cylinder.

As long as the CW tank is above the top of the HW cylinder (or more correctly, the flow pipe), then water will flow into the bottom of the HW cylinder and out of the top and you will have, more or less except for pipe restrictions, the same pressure at the taps as the CW from the tank.

Where you site this in order to create space for other things is for you to decide.

I did this because the house I moved into was too small at the time to waste space on an airing cupboard. I run 2 pumped showers from a separate connection in the HW cylinder and 2 baths as well as the kitchen etc and have never had a flow problem with washing machine or dishwasher on while showering etc, except when the cylinder scaled up so that nothing could flow through it, but that's another story.

I suspect the reasoning behind originally putting the cylinder in the house is one of insulation before pre-insulated cylinders became the norm.

Just my opinion and experience.
 
Not sure you quite understand the main issue here, the system you are proposing to install is a traditional Gravity one i.e. the cold water storage cistern has to be above the hot water cylinder as the water flows between them by gravity (& then on to the taps or booster pumps).
The "grunt" for fire-hose showers suggests a cold water storage of at least 100 gals with a large hot water storage to boot. The cistern needs 350mm clear space above it so even using a horizontal hot water cylinder you are not going to have a loft space left.
and what sort of base are you going to construct to support the cistern, there is a lot of weight going up in a structure that was not originally designed for it ?
 
Last edited:
Thanks all. I’m getting abetter grip o f this:

1) I can see pre-tumble dryers, you wanted an airing cupboard.
2) The dead-leg will still be a pain but liveable.

3) Quote:

The tank is a bulge in a pipe. My HW cylinder is in the loft, with the bottom of the cold water tank just above (about 12") the top of the HW cylinder.

Yes, that is how I had it. Put the bulge in a pipe where we like. The head doesn’t change. You run 2 x pumps via separate connection. Exactly the set-up I’m after.

For ‘grunt’ I realise I need stonking great tanks with all the weight problems that come with them. I have an RSJ if need be.

Chris Watkins says

The cistern needs 350mm clear space above it so even using a horizontal hot water cylinder you are not going to have a loft space left.

Is this 350mm a regs thing? This could be the killer. Why do we need 350mm of air above a tank? 350mm for both CW + F&E?
 
Last edited:
It is possible, here's one I installed when I was 18. (not the wood work that was me dad's handy work).
The problem is if you want to put the pumps up there as well, the suction they can create can pull air in via the open vent.
2008_0705Nans0021.JPG
 
350mm is access for maintenance. It is a law (though I had remembered it as 300mm for some reason). Also the hot water needs to reach taps in less than 30 seconds. That is also the law. Both in Water Regulations.
To be honest, a power shower and combination cylinder sounds like the wrong idea. If you want a power shower off a vented cylinder, a separate cistern and cylinder is a much better plan.
 
The cistern needs 350mm clear space above it so even using a horizontal hot water cylinder you are not going to have a loft space left.

Is this 350mm a regs thing? This could be the killer. Why do we need 350mm of air above a tank? 350mm for both CW + F&E?
Water Regs 1990 - G16. 14a: Minimum unobstructed space for cisterns up to 1,000L. Need space to maintain the float valve & inspect / clean cistern.
 
Last edited:
300mm or 350mm, neither will fly. So I 'm into the more roomy section of the loft. With CW's Dad's design or similar. I realsie I will have head problems feeding shower-pumps, but that is doable. Works now , where they are. This move increases the pump-head.

I cited combination cylinders as an example of what I had in mind. I've not seen any that will have the 'grunt'. I'll need the existing moved upwards.

30 secs to hot? I understand you can get return-loop pumps. Is this a work-round?
 
One more problem with cylinder in loft: if there is very low head between the cistern and cylinder, is there not a risk of dragging air down the vent when the pump runs as the flow into the cylinder from the cistern may not keep up with the flow from the pump?
 
One more problem with cylinder in loft: if there is very low head between the cistern and cylinder, is there not a risk of dragging air down the vent when the pump runs as the flow into the cylinder from the cistern may not keep up with the flow from the pump?

So it's twinned 22mm to everything. And Essex Flanges etc.
Currently the highest pump sits midpoint to the HW tank. It's fine. Moved upward will be good.
 
Shower pumps in my experience (which is small) are poor. Combi never in a million years. Storage Combi possibly but not in a loft. Unvented system yes. It will perform and be more effective than most other options
 
Hold your horses, my dads design supported a 230L cistern (with 120L hot below) with 2 showers galloping away you will need to support 450 Litres of cold alone that 1/2 a ton (500kg) with the pipework etc.
 
Shower pumps in my experience (which is small) are poor. Combi never in a million years. Storage Combi possibly but not in a loft. Unvented system yes. It will perform and be more effective than most other options

An unvented loses one tank, but unless I am missing this, it doesn't solve the real problem I have here, I still need a stonking great CW Tank etc to run this lot. Or does it?
 
You also have to calculate the height of the vent pipe above the cistern (and the f&e cos they NOT the same) so must be taken into account when looking at the max height of the cistern.

I was ponderin' that one. Water won't form a point, it stays stubbornly level. But the roof does, I can pitch the vent in this space. It's tight, but not impossible.
 
Shower pumps in my experience (which is small) are poor. Combi never in a million years. Storage Combi possibly but not in a loft. Unvented system yes. It will perform and be more effective than most other options

With a poor incomer, it is possible to have a high pressure unvented but you need a pump on the output from a big cistern feeding it. That cistern can be located anywhere (so long as you have a couple of flapper type non return valves in the output to stop back flow and you have seriously sized overflow on the tank just in case.

Doing it that way put the weight somewhere much safer.
 
With a poor incomer, it is possible to have a high pressure unvented but you need a pump on the output from a big cistern feeding it. That cistern can be located anywhere (so long as you have a couple of flapper type non return valves in the output to stop back flow and you have seriously sized overflow on the tank just in case.

Doing it that way put the weight somewhere much safer.

So let me have this right. I put large tanks where I like, supply a sealed system pumped from this. I'm no fan of storing all that weight in my loft, and it won't be cheap or easy. If I go the sealed route, I've water at the pressure of my supply pump, stored somewhere safer? I can still move my HW tank into the loft, or anywhere really, but I've lost the massive CW tank in the loft. CW tank is now a supply tank placed any where I like as well? Have I got it?
 
Last edited:
I believe the cistern referred to there is the cold water tank. The (traditional type) hot water cylinder doesn't have a float valve.

Yes, I'd need a horizontal cylinder to get headroom for the CW tank/ cistern above it?
 
So let me have this right. I put large tanks where I like, supply a sealed system pumped from this. I'm no fan of storing all that weight in my loft, and it won't be cheap or easy. If I go the sealed route, I've water at the pressure of my supply pump, stored somewhere safer? I can still move my HW tank into the loft, or anywhere really, but I've lost the massive CW tank in the loft. CW tank is now a supply tank placed any where I like as well? Have I got it?

Yep
 
Thank you . So in conclusion, a sealed-system's big advantage if I can find mains pressure to run it, is that,

1) Whilst some locations are better, at a push, I can put tanks broadly where I like.
2) In my case the HW tank will still find its way into the loft, simply because that's where there's space, (and gravity helps feed F & R to it too) but it could sit on the ground floor, next to the boiler, or even below it?
The downside is complication and getting a 'bloke' in.

Whereas a trad. system struggles to find loft-headroom, and weight is the worry. But at push, might be possible.
 
Thank you . Whereas a trad. system struggles to find loft-headroom, and weight is the worry. But at push, might be possible.

Just a fact for you. NO new house builder puts in low pressure systems anymore - not one. An HP system will also affords you a wider choice of kit to use. An LP system can work out expensive in things like showers as they have to be so much better machined.
 
Overall, yes an unvented system ( sealed) is leaps and bounds better, although vented systems are still very common and have a use as it were.
 
Thanks all.

An HP system will also affords you a wider choice of kit to use. An LP system can work out expensive in things like showers as they have to be so much better machined.

How is that? I'd have it that a 'pump is a pump', I can see, if said pump was already fed at 1bar, it has less work to do, so we see more 'grunt' for our trouble, but what am I missing? Is that the only reason we need better kit?
 

Reply to Why are Cylinders rarely in the loft for Trad. Gravity Vented Systems? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Similar plumbing topics

Hi, Can anyone advise as to why the cold water to my bathroom keeps airlocking? This originally happened about 12 months ago and has happened 3-4 times since. It’s an upstairs bathroom, fed from a tank in the attic. The tank is about 8 Meters away and feeds a bath, sink and toilet. The tank...
Replies
9
Views
250
We run a community village hall and have a large kitchen provided for the use of hirers. This includes a Lincat SLR9 gas cooker which I believe is a 23.8Kw appliance with all six burners and oven on max. This was installed some 10 years ago and has passed all subsequent Gas Safety inspections as...
Replies
3
Views
138
Hello all, I’m replacing a concrete paving slab patio in the back yard. The original patio used 50mm deep concrete slabs on hardcore & sand. I’m planning to pour a 100mm deep concrete patio on 100mm hardcore. In order to achieve the same final height to line up with the rest of the patio, I...
Replies
5
Views
130
Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

Newest Plumbing Threads

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock