My view would be ID as you pointed out that you do not think it has been commissioned (take it there is no paperwork?)also as you have no way to test it, therefore not able to prove it safe for continued use?
may be talking rubbish as usual but that's the way I look at it.
The reality is that the teaching is to protect pipework from contact with cement/concrete.
The reasoning is that thermal expansion and contraction may cause abrasions, I think Portland and Lafarge? ? do testing and reports about the interaction between copper and wet/dry cement/concrete and the...
I bet those bends were off of the original system, have to admit the bloke must have known what he was doing (if it works) because I get travel sick just trying to trace it!
honestly this is just like the one in one of the properties I look after (think it was done end 14 beginning of 15) I saw it and asked some questions, like WTF? guess how much it cost?
answers on a postcard
£600 is the answer!
oops, could have sworn I wrote .25 on water gauge and .2 reading to one decimal place and .25 reading to two on digital.
cheers for the correction thereisawizza, glad someone is on the pulse
.5 on water gauge and .25 on electronic, so if the op had used an electronic gauge and the board man used a water gauge the boardman would not have seen a permissible drop
Riley, (knowing that you have said that the heat side is ok) I am still going to go with...low gas pressure as the sequence you describe is about right, burner fails and tries again (5 times?) saying that flame rectification is almost the same or just ignore this as I am only trying to bump my...
CT 1 here as well, cracking stuff, once used you wont want to use anything else, saw a double butlers sink put in from the bottom just using it, the chap held it for about 3 minutes then let go and filled both up, I was amazed.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.